If you are still deciding whether to do this at all
Three articles, in the order we send them by email. The first is designed to talk the wrong person out of it.
Most writing about ayahuasca is either mystical or promotional. This is neither. It is what we tell guests on screening calls, written down so you can read it before you contact anybody — including the parts that talk you out of coming.
Ayahuasca is not a treatment for any condition, and nothing here will suggest otherwise.
Where studies exist we name the sample size and what they do not show.
The physician, the integration leads and the founder. Reviewed before publishing.
69.9% of drinkers get a physical adverse effect and 2.3% need a doctor. The 7 conditions that rule a person out, and the second screening list that only applies above 8,000 feet.
Every retreat page publishes a contraindication list. Almost none of them mention altitude, and the CDC has a separate list for anywhere above 2,450 m. Cusco sits at 11,150 feet, so both lists apply here.
We recomputed the statistics in the most-cited study and found 4 errors. What 40 first-time drinkers actually showed, and what no centre can claim.
4 to 6 hours of drug, 7 hours in the room, 3 months to the number that counts. Most articles collapse all three into one.
Most people arrive at a blog like this through one search and leave without finding the article that would actually have helped. This is the sequence we send by email.
Three articles, in the order we send them by email. The first is designed to talk the wrong person out of it.
Nothing here is medical advice, and no article on this site will tell you that ayahuasca treats a condition. If you want a question answered that we have not written about, ask and we will answer by email — and if it is a good question, it becomes the next article.
A physician reads every application before anyone takes a payment, and about one in five does not proceed. Nothing is charged either way, and a no comes with the reason in writing.